Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 4:19 AM, Dimitri Fontaine
> <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com> wrote:
>> You sound like you want to drop the last Commit Fest and prepare beta
> I think I was pretty clear about what I was proposing in the message
> with which I started this thread - bump some or all the big,
> outstanding patches to leave more time for stabilizing the tree.
> Almost everyone said "no". That's the community's decision and I
> accept it, but IMHO it's a tacit decision to slip the release.
I don't think that was the conclusion. What I thought we were saying
was that we didn't want to bounce those patches in advance of any CF
review at all. But IMO we should put the larger patches on a very short
leash: if they don't appear pretty clean and trouble-free, they should
get postponed. We need to minimize the time spent on new patches, but
we don't have to drive it to zero.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Magnus Hagander||Date: 2010-01-12 18:37:40|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication and non-blocking I/O|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-01-12 18:27:33|
|Subject: Re: NOT NULL violation and error-message |