Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL Docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Date: 2007-11-28 20:53:04
Message-ID: 21686.1196283184@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docspgsql-patches
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> Best practices for partitioning so far have shown that TRIGGERs are
> better than RULEs for most cases.  Please find attached a patch which
> reflects this.

Entirely removing the example of how to do it with rules doesn't
seem like a good idea.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2007-11-28 20:57:10
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2007-11-28 20:46:45
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: David FetterDate: 2007-11-28 20:57:10
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules
Previous:From: David FetterDate: 2007-11-28 20:46:45
Subject: Re: Partition: use triggers instead of rules

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group