Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: Bruce Badger <bruce_badger(at)badgerse(dot)com>,PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version
Date: 2003-08-29 20:54:51
Message-ID: 21645.1062190491@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> Tom, just curious as to what your resistance is to this feature? ISTM
> that making this admin modifiable doesn't hurt anyone and could be
> helpful to some people. 

Admin modifiable at what level?  I don't believe that the "feature" is
valuable enough to warrant defining, implementing, and documenting a GUC
variable, let alone adding a pg_hba.conf column which one could imagine
someone wanting instead.  I suggested a simple source code change, and
I think that's quite sufficient when we have only one request for it
with a not-very-compelling rationale.  There are much more useful tweaks
(eg, altering BLCKSZ) that we have equivalent levels of support for.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: John BattlesDate: 2003-08-30 01:40:09
Subject: pgadmin3-0.9.1 wxwindows build woes utils/misc.cpp:389: error: no matching function for call to `wxMBConv::MB2WC
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2003-08-29 20:39:39
Subject: Re: FE/BE Protocol - Specific version

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group