Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [Fwd: Re: Outer joins and Seq scans]

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sami Dalouche <skoobi(at)free(dot)fr>
Cc: pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Outer joins and Seq scans]
Date: 2007-10-31 22:05:16
Message-ID: 21628.1193868316@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance
Sami Dalouche <skoobi(at)free(dot)fr> writes:
> -- For some reason, my message doesn't seem to go through the mailing
> list, so I am trying without any attachment

Please don't do that, at least not that way.  These explain outputs have
been line-wrapped to the point of utter unreadability.

The main problem looks to me that you're trying to do a 25-way join.
You'll want to increase join_collapse_limit and maybe fool with the
geqo parameters.  I fear you won't get a plan in a sane amount of time
if you try to do the full query as a single exhaustive search.  You
can either raise join_collapse_limit all the way and trust geqo to
find a decent plan repeatably (not a real safe assumption unfortunately)
or raise both join_collapse_limit and geqo_threshold to some
intermediate level and hope that a slightly wider partial plan search
will find the plan you need.

It's also possible that you're just stuck and the outer join is
inherently harder to execute.  I didn't study the query closely enough
to see if it's joining to any left join right-hand-sides, or anything
else that would forbid picking a nice join order.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2007-10-31 22:30:40
Subject: Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL
Previous:From: Ron St-PierreDate: 2007-10-31 22:01:34
Subject: Re: hardware and For PostgreSQL

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group