| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, List pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
| Date: | 2007-04-17 14:33:45 |
| Message-ID: | 21622.1176820425@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> BTW I just noticed this bug in the comment above a_expr:
> * Note that '(' a_expr ')' is a b_expr, so an unrestricted expression can
> * always be used by surrounding it with parens.
> It is wrong because it's not a b_expr, but a c_expr.
Well, it's right in context because the comment is discussing the
difference between a_expr and b_expr. Also, a c_expr is-a b_expr.
If anyone seriously wants to propose removing postfix ops from b_expr,
we'd better take it up on someplace more widely read than -patches.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-04-17 15:00:24 | Re: Buildfarm member Narwhal: Python 2.5/8.1 |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 14:15:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 18:06:33 | Re: log_autovacuum |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-04-17 14:15:20 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch |