Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Adam Walczykiewicz" <adam(dot)walczykiewicz(at)multiuser(dot)com(dot)pl>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)hub(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to
Date: 2000-01-06 16:43:46
Message-ID: 21591.947177026@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Adam, I think you are running into the same problem with overly large
procedure definitions that's been discussed here recently. In 6.5.*
it's not safe to create a procedure def that's more than 2700 bytes.
Workaround: split your code into smaller functions.

7.0 will be better...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-06 16:46:10 Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 2000-01-06 16:42:37 Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch