Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] setof record "out" syntax and returning records
Date: 2008-01-21 23:03:29
Message-ID: 21575.1200956609@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-generalpgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Strange.  Most of the time I'd have no problem writing this off as a
>> build-synchronization error, but the tree has been so quiet lately due
>> to the release cycle that this seems an odd time to be seeing such a
>> problem.

> This was on a laptop I hadn't used in some time, and I think I must have
> done "make install" in, for example, src/backend only.

Ah.  That could explain it, if you had a plpgsql.so that was quite out
of date compared to the backend.  OK, then I'm prepared to forget about
this one ...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-21 23:06:30
Subject: Re: Strange locking choices in pg_shdepend.c
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-01-21 23:01:04
Subject: Thoughts about bug #3883

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Guillermo AriasDate: 2008-01-21 23:47:37
Subject: create a limited user in Postgre
Previous:From: Henrry Joshney Servitá SánchezDate: 2008-01-21 22:38:03
Subject: publicar

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group