Re: Removal of temp tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Removal of temp tables
Date: 2001-06-14 20:15:03
Message-ID: 21540.992549703@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> If you don't like pg_temp here, maybe post_temp? pgsql_temp?

> What if I call the directory tmp or pgsql_tmp and the files
> pgsql_pid_#.#?

Why are you so eager not to call temp files "temp"? If you want to
spell it "pgsql_tmp" or "pg_temporary" or something different from
"pg_temp", that's fine, but I really think the files ought to clearly
label themselves as temporary. "pid" is not a clear label. With a
name like that, people might even think they are lock files.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 20:17:36 Re: Removal of temp tables
Previous Message Mike Mascari 2001-06-14 20:03:53 Update on Access 97 and = NULL

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 20:17:36 Re: Removal of temp tables
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-06-14 19:46:41 Re: Removal of temp tables