Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Toby Corkindale <toby(dot)corkindale(at)strategicdata(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug? Query plans / EXPLAIN using gigabytes of memory
Date: 2012-04-26 03:11:51
Message-ID: 21462.1335409911@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general
Toby Corkindale <toby(dot)corkindale(at)strategicdata(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Just wondering if anyone else has thoughts on this?

> I'm still suspicious that this is a bug.

Well, if you were to provide a reproducible test case, somebody might be
motivated to look into it.  There could be a memory leak in the planner
somewhere, but without a test case it's not very practical to go look
for it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-04-26 03:56:32
Subject: Re: empty role names in pg_dumpall output
Previous:From: Bill MoranDate: 2012-04-26 02:47:49
Subject: Re: How can I see if my code is "concurrency safe"?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group