From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Fuzzy matching? |
Date: | 2001-07-31 18:48:37 |
Message-ID: | 21448.996605317@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches pgsql-sql |
"Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
> In any case, metaphone is reportedly more accurate (at least for English
> words) than soundex, and levenshtein offers an entirely different and
> interesting approach. Any interest in having all three of these in the
> backend?
I'd certainly accept such functions as /contrib material, but probably
would want to wait to see if they get used much before putting them in
the standard backend ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Padgett | 2001-07-31 18:56:51 | Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison" |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-07-31 18:15:36 | Re: Fuzzy matching? |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-07-31 20:09:51 | Re: Fuzzy matching? |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2001-07-31 18:15:36 | Re: Fuzzy matching? |