Re: Fuzzy matching?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fuzzy matching?
Date: 2001-07-31 18:48:37
Message-ID: 21448.996605317@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches pgsql-sql

"Joe Conway" <joseph(dot)conway(at)home(dot)com> writes:
> In any case, metaphone is reportedly more accurate (at least for English
> words) than soundex, and levenshtein offers an entirely different and
> interesting approach. Any interest in having all three of these in the
> backend?

I'd certainly accept such functions as /contrib material, but probably
would want to wait to see if they get used much before putting them in
the standard backend ...

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Padgett 2001-07-31 18:56:51 Re: Revised Patch to allow multiple table locks in "Unison"
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2001-07-31 18:15:36 Re: Fuzzy matching?

Browse pgsql-sql by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2001-07-31 20:09:51 Re: Fuzzy matching?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2001-07-31 18:15:36 Re: Fuzzy matching?