Re: generic copy options

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)frogthinker(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <Emmanuel(dot)Cecchet(at)asterdata(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: generic copy options
Date: 2009-09-21 17:51:33
Message-ID: 21430.1253555493@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> As far as I can tell, the majority opinion is to use "format csv"

BTW, if we're going to do that, shouldn't the "binary" option instead
be spelled "format binary"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-21 17:52:43 Re: updated hstore patch
Previous Message David E. Wheeler 2009-09-21 17:50:44 Re: updated hstore patch