Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy <serg(at)vostok(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
Date: 2007-01-30 15:20:22
Message-ID: 2143.1170170422@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Sergiy Vyshnevetskiy <serg(at)vostok(dot)net> writes:
> This hack makes SPI_pusn()/SPI_pop() wrapper optional.

We are *certainly* not fixing it like that.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Sergiy VyshnevetskiyDate: 2007-01-30 15:29:25
Subject: Re: BUG #2945: possibly forgotten SPI_push()/SPI_pop()
Previous:From: Yosef HaasDate: 2007-01-30 15:13:56
Subject: Re: now() in PL/pgSQL Functions

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group