srb(at)cuci(dot)nl (Stephen R. van den Berg) writes:
> Anyway, since ctid's solve my problem, I'm not particularly keen on
> getting the LIMIT support on UPDATE/DELETE anymore.
> I still think that the ctid solution is ugly and non-portable.
Well, they're both ugly and nonportable, IMHO.
To me the deciding argument is that the LIMIT approach is also
dangerous, because it encourages people to use incompletely-specified
queries to modify their data. See other messages in this thread for
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-09-23 15:13:39|
|Subject: Default privileges for 7.3|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2002-09-23 14:01:06|
|Subject: Re: DROP COLUMN misbehaviour with multiple inheritance |