Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Right, we can just close the pipe. I was thinking of adding another
>>> signal but that's obviously easier. Will work on making this happen.
>> ... except there is no postmaster pipe anymore --- back to plan A.
> Did we get a resolution on this?
Yes, I committed the change several days ago. The pgstat processes are
told to shut down at the same time the shutdown checkpoint starts.
I didn't actually make the postmaster wait for them, but I'd think that
under normal circumstances the shutdown checkpoint will take longer.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers-win32 by date
|Next:||From: Andreas Pflug||Date: 2004-06-19 20:10:10|
|Subject: Re: Compiling libpq with VisualC|
|Previous:||From: Merlin Moncure||Date: 2004-06-17 20:58:12|
|Subject: PostgreSQL SCM|