Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] initdb

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Postgresql Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>,pgsql-hackers-win32 <pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Date: 2003-10-04 19:58:35
Message-ID: 21306.1065297515@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-hackers-win32pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> I now have a C implementation of initdb, ...
> There's a little work still to go (see below), but I'd appreciate some 
> eyeballs on it to see if I have made any major booboos, or could have 
> done things better. What's the best way to proceed?

Put it on a web page and post the link, or if you don't have a website,
send it to pgsql-patches (clearly marked as "not ready to apply").

			regards, tom lane

In response to

  • initdb at 2003-10-03 18:32:56 from Andrew Dunstan

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Hannu KrosingDate: 2003-10-04 20:59:00
Subject: Re: COUNT(*) again (was Re: [HACKERS] Index/Function
Previous:From: James RogersDate: 2003-10-04 19:19:46
Subject: Re: Index/Function organized table layout

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2003-10-04 22:51:08
Subject: Re: more spanish updates
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-10-04 19:43:34
Subject: Re: fix log_min_duration_statement logic error

pgsql-hackers-win32 by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-04 23:15:15
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] initdb
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2003-10-03 18:57:42
Subject: Re: initdb

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group