| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Lic(dot) Martin Marques" <martin(at)bugs(dot)unl(dot)edu(dot)ar>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, pgsql general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: solving wraparound |
| Date: | 2005-12-31 20:35:14 |
| Message-ID: | 21294.1136061314@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Anyone think it might be reasonable to add a GUC option that tells
>> autovacuum to monitor for wraparound only, and not for more general
>> usage based vacuuming? Something like autovac_wraparound_only. Not
>> sure I like the idea, but thought it might be worth some discussion.
> I believe 8.1 will actually stop allowing transactions if a wraparound
> is going to occur.
Yeah. I don't see any value to running autovac *only* for this purpose.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2005-12-31 20:49:00 | Re: solving wraparound |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-31 20:21:08 | Re: MDX support in postgresql |