Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)googlemail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP: Deferrable unique constraints
Date: 2009-07-21 21:55:12
Message-ID: 21286.1248213312@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 22:01 +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
>> I'm not seeing an obvious alternative location to utils/adt. Any advice would
>> be appreciated.

You could make a fair case for either backend/catalog or
backend/commands.  Maybe the latter since that's where the core
trigger support is.

> My first reaction is utils/misc.

I always hated that directory.  *Double* failure to classify.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2009-07-21 22:10:05
Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-21 21:48:41
Subject: Re: pg_restore --clean vs. large object

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group