Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the
Date: 2007-08-30 16:08:05
Message-ID: 2128.1188490085@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committerspgsql-hackers
ohp(at)pyrenet(dot)fr writes:
> Ok, do you need it on unixware?
> do you need it more than once a week?

No, and no.

> FYI, centaurc is running make check for 3 hours now and has'nt finished!

You're finding out why I suggested a really low duty cycle ;-)

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Jean-Paul ArgudoDate: 2007-08-30 16:08:42
Subject: tsearch2, gin and @@@ operator?
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-08-30 16:01:48
Subject: Re: Why is there a tsquery data type?

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: User Machr2Date: 2007-08-30 16:19:27
Subject: pgcheck - pokus: improved comments of code
Previous:From: ohpDate: 2007-08-30 15:49:21
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix brain fade in DefineIndex(): it was continuing to access the

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group