Re: Casts question

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Casts question
Date: 2004-06-18 16:09:58
Message-ID: 21241.1087574998@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Shachar Shemesh <psql(at)shemesh(dot)biz> writes:
> I have defined a datatype called "varcharci", shamelessly yanking the
> input, output, recv and send functions from varchar. This means (as far
> as I understand things) that this type is binary compatible with varchar.

Use text, not varchar.

> Why is that? Being as it is that no operator = is defined for varcharci,
> and that the cast from varchar to varcharci is "as assignment" anyways,
> shouldn't postgres be able to do the cast implicitly?

Yes, it can cast to varchar, but that doesn't help because there are no
varchar operators ;-). To resolve the operator, it has to promote both
sides to text, and you didn't offer a cast to text.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2004-06-18 17:11:19 Re: specifying multiple result format codes with libpq
Previous Message Tom Lane 2004-06-18 16:00:10 Re: Using domains for case insensitivity