From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> |
Cc: | Greg Quinn <greg(at)officium(dot)co(dot)za>, pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Inserting values into a variable table |
Date: | 2006-11-26 18:23:50 |
Message-ID: | 21234.1164565430@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, 26 Nov 2006, Greg Quinn wrote:
>> Now as you can imagine, on the server side, if you have 100 users, and all
>> their message source sitting in one big table, it can slow down read
>> operations because of all the disk i/o.
>>
>> Previously, I was using MySQL and placing all the users data into separate
>> tables gave me a huge performance increase.
> That makes sense, although table partitioning might be a good fit for what
> you're trying to do.
To be blunt, this sounds like you didn't have your tables properly indexed.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bo Berglund | 2006-11-26 20:08:50 | Re: Which installer for Postgres on Windows? |
Previous Message | Andrej Ricnik-Bay | 2006-11-26 17:20:50 | Re: Inserting values into a variable table |