From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #6176: pg_dump dumps pg_catalog tables |
Date: | 2011-08-25 14:52:03 |
Message-ID: | 2120.1314283923@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Chander Ganesan" <chander(at)otg-nc(dot)com> writes:
> Normally, the pg_dump command ignored the pg_catalog tables when performing
> a dump. However, when provided the '--table' argument it fails to ignore
> the pg_catalog table.
> For example, suppose I had tables p1-p10 that I wanted to dump, I could use
> the following command:
> pg_dump test_db --table 'p*'
> This command would dump the requested tables, but it would also dump all the
> tables (in all schemas) that start with 'p*' . Generally speaking, there
> are no "excluded schemas" when using the pg_dump command with the '--table'
> argument.
> It is my belief that the pg_catalog tables should almost always be ignored
> (lest restores fail miserably).
This proposal seems overly simplistic to me: if we did this, it would be
impossible to use pg_dump to dump a catalog's contents at all. (I don't
care whether the resulting script is restorable; sometimes you just need
to see what's actually in pg_class.)
I wonder whether it would be helpful to provide a default setting for
--exclude-schema that lists pg_catalog, information_schema, etc.
If we approached it that way, it'd be possible to override the default
at need. However, I'm not sure how that switch interacts with wildcard
--table specs ...
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chander Ganesan | 2011-08-25 15:09:30 | Re: BUG #6176: pg_dump dumps pg_catalog tables |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-08-25 14:22:06 | Re: libber library not found on RC1 |