| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Date: | 2005-12-02 03:14:12 |
| Message-ID: | 21146.1133493252@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches pgsql-ports |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> --with-preference-bsd-libedit prefer libedit over readline
Can't it just be --with-libedit? That seems awfully verbose,
particularly seeing that configure doesn't handle switch abbreviation.
The patch looks OK offhand, though I didn't try to test it.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Uwe C. Schroeder | 2005-12-02 03:18:10 | Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql |
| Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-12-02 03:03:33 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 03:27:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-02 03:06:15 | Re: Fork-based version of pgbench |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 03:27:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-02 02:44:32 | Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline? |