Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Seneca Cunningham <scunning(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Date: 2005-12-02 03:14:12
Message-ID: 21146.1133493252@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patchespgsql-ports
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> 	--with-preference-bsd-libedit    prefer libedit over readline

Can't it just be --with-libedit?  That seems awfully verbose,
particularly seeing that configure doesn't handle switch abbreviation.

The patch looks OK offhand, though I didn't try to test it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 03:27:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 02:44:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Uwe C. SchroederDate: 2005-12-02 03:18:10
Subject: Re: 8.1, OID's and plpgsql
Previous:From: Stephen FrostDate: 2005-12-02 03:03:33
Subject: Re: Reducing relation locking overhead

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-12-02 03:27:32
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Should libedit be preferred to libreadline?
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2005-12-02 03:06:15
Subject: Re: Fork-based version of pgbench

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group