Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Nested Transactions, Abort All
Date: 2004-07-03 15:28:16
Message-ID: 21042.1088868496@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> This seems like a irregularity in the API that makes sense only from an
> implementation point of view.

You are attacking a straw man.  This does *not* "make sense from an
implementation point of view" --- it's easier to have just one command
(and in fact that is what is in CVS tip).  The proposal to use different
commands was advanced on the grounds that it's a more user-friendly API.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andreas PflugDate: 2004-07-03 15:59:17
Subject: LinuxTag wrapup
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2004-07-03 15:10:23
Subject: Re: Adding VERSION to startup log output

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group