Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pgsql: Document txid functions.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Document txid functions.
Date: 2007-11-05 16:21:05
Message-ID: 21023.1194279665@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> momjian(at)postgresql(dot)org (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> Log Message:
> -----------
> Document txid functions.
>> 
>> Please revert this change.  It makes these functions far more prominent
>> than is justified.

> Have you looked at the output?

Yes, I did.  I don't like giving these function their own <sect1>
heading --- if they deserve it, then why not every other little group of
functions under System Information Functions and System Administration
Functions too?  I also find it entirely unreasonable to treat the
datatype as a major datatype category.

I thought the stuff was adequately documented already, which is why I
suggest just reverting this.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-committers by date

Next:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2007-11-05 16:22:53
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2007-11-05 16:10:50
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add a note about another issue that needs to be considered before

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group