Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This patch is nowhere near ready for submission :-(. Most of the
>> comments seem to be "I don't know what to do here" ...
> Just to be clear, I think what Tom's saying it's not ready to be *applied*.
> Sending patches to this list early and often during development is generally
Indeed, but if that was the point we should have been seeing drafts of
this patch long ago. I interpreted Sergey's submission as "getting this
in before feature freeze", and in that context the bar is higher. If a
patch isn't pretty nearly ready to be applied when the freeze deadline
arrives, we won't wait around for it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Martijn van Oosterhout||Date: 2006-07-26 15:29:27|
|Subject: Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-07-26 15:07:06|
|Subject: Re: xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations |
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2006-07-26 15:29:51|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree |
|Previous:||From: Gregory Stark||Date: 2006-07-26 15:04:30|
|Subject: Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree|