Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch implementing the multi-argument aggregates (SOC project)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch implementing the multi-argument aggregates (SOC project)
Date: 2006-07-26 15:16:29
Message-ID: 2099.1153926989@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Gregory Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> This patch is nowhere near ready for submission :-(.  Most of the
>> comments seem to be "I don't know what to do here" ...

> Just to be clear, I think what Tom's saying it's not ready to be *applied*.
> Sending patches to this list early and often during development is generally
> encouraged.

Indeed, but if that was the point we should have been seeing drafts of
this patch long ago.  I interpreted Sergey's submission as "getting this
in before feature freeze", and in that context the bar is higher.  If a
patch isn't pretty nearly ready to be applied when the freeze deadline
arrives, we won't wait around for it.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2006-07-26 15:29:27
Subject: Re: Refactoring the API for amgetmulti
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-26 15:07:06
Subject: Re: xlogdump behaviour translating dropped relations

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2006-07-26 15:29:51
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2006-07-26 15:04:30
Subject: Re: Resurrecting per-page cleaner for btree

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group