Re: hash index improving v3

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Xiao Meng" <mx(dot)cogito(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Zdenek Kotala" <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)sun(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: hash index improving v3
Date: 2008-09-06 18:14:26
Message-ID: 20927.1220724866@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Alex Hunsaker" <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> - tbm_add_tuples(tbm, &scan->xs_ctup.t_self, 1, false);
> + tbm_add_tuples(tbm, &scan->xs_ctup.t_self, 1, true);

Hah, I bet that explains Jonah's complaint that recheck didn't seem to
be happening in his tests. Nice catch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 18:23:35 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Fix an oversight in the 8.2 patch that improved mergejoin
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 18:12:32 Re: reducing statistics write overhead

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-09-06 19:09:38 Re: hash index improving v3
Previous Message Alex Hunsaker 2008-09-06 05:49:05 Re: hash index improving v3