Re: performance libpq vs JDBC

Can you trying writing libpq program using COPY functions?
I hope it will be better than prepared statements.

Best Regards,
Divakar

________________________________
From: Werner Scholtes <Werner(dot)Scholtes(at)heuboe(dot)de>
To: "pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Sent: Wed, December 15, 2010 8:21:55 PM
Subject: [PERFORM] performance libpq vs JDBC

I wrote a test program in C++ using libpq. It works as follows (pseudo code):

for( int loop = 0; loop < 1000; ++loop ) {
PQexec("BEGIN");
const char* sql = "INSERT INTO pg_perf_test (id, text) VALUES($1,$2)";
PQprepare(m_conn,"stmtid",sql,0,NULL);
for ( int i = 0; i < 1000; ++i )
// Set values etc.
PQexecPrepared(m_conn,…);
}
PQexec("DEALLOCATE stmtid");
PQexec("COMMIT");
}

I measured the duration of every loop of the outer for-loop resulting in an
average of 450 ms (per 1000 data sets insert)

After that, I wrote a test program in Java using JDBC. It works as follows:

for( intloops = 0; loops < 1000; ++i) {
String sql = "INSERT INTO pq_perf_test (id,text) VALUES (?,?)";
PreparedStatement stmt = con.prepareStatement(sql);
for(inti = 0; i < 1000; ++i ) {
// Set values etc.
stmt.addBatch();
}
stmt.executeBatch();
con.commit();
stmt.close();
}

I measured the duration of every loop of the outer for-loop resulting in an
average of 100 ms (per 1000 data sets insert)

This means that accessing PostgreSQL by JDBC is about 4-5 times faster than
using libpq.

Comparable results have been measured with analog update and delete statements.

I need to enhance the performance of my C++ code. Is there any possibility in
libpq to reach the performance of JDBC for INSERT, UPDATE and DELETE statements
(I have no chance to use COPY statements)? I didn't find anything comparable to
PreparedStatement.executeBatch() in libpq.

Best regards,
Werner Scholtes