Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, me(at)oisinglynn(dot)com, Bill Moran <wmoran(at)collaborativefusion(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Predicted lifespan of different PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-01-29 22:37:58
Message-ID: 20885.1170110278@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> I am pretty amazed people are considering shortening the release cycle
> for our most popular platform.

Are you volunteering to back-port and test all the Windows fixes that
never went into 8.0?

I think we should either do that, or admit that we're not supporting
8.0.x on Windows. I favor the latter; I'm certainly unwilling to spend
any of my own time on the former.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-01-29 22:48:10 Re: Crazy Error
Previous Message ZappA 2007-01-29 22:34:49 Re: Crazy Error