| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: User survey suggestion: add CVS as a choice |
| Date: | 2005-10-10 15:02:44 |
| Message-ID: | 20877.1128956564@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 02:24:35PM -0000, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
>> In either case, I think the handful of people who use cvs rule it out
>> as an answer, IMO.
> Is CVS usage really that low? I don't know, not having seen any
> activity logs.
... and we'll never find out, if we take surveys that exclude the
possibility.
I concur with Michael that pulling the head of a release branch might be
a perfectly sane way to build a production installation. What if you
need a bug fix that's in CVS but not yet appeared in any dot-release?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-10-10 15:14:35 | Re: User survey suggestion: add CVS as a choice |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-10-10 14:38:00 | Re: User survey suggestion: add CVS as a choice |