Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Sergey E(dot) Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug
Date: 2006-02-15 23:40:22
Message-ID: 20868.1140046822@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
"Sergey E. Koposov" <math(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)ru> writes:
> Are there any problems with that patch to not be applied ? 

Hasn't been reviewed yet ... see nearby discussions about shortage
of patch reviewers ...

> (Sorry if I'm hurrying)

At the moment it's not unusual for nontrivial patches to sit around
for a month or two, unless they happen to attract special interest of
one of the committers.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2006-02-15 23:51:21
Subject: Re: Strange Create Index behaviour
Previous:From: Sergey E. KoposovDate: 2006-02-15 23:35:25
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Kris JurkaDate: 2006-02-16 02:38:47
Subject: constant too large in port/gettimeofday
Previous:From: Sergey E. KoposovDate: 2006-02-15 23:35:25
Subject: Re: patch fixing the old RETURN NEXT bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group