| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com |
| Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Nicolai Tufar" <ntufar(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers-win32(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests |
| Date: | 2005-03-01 20:31:22 |
| Message-ID: | 20730.1109709082@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-hackers-win32 |
pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com writes:
> Just a question, and don't mind me if I am being rude, isn't this the
> WRONG PLACE for a "printf" function? Wouldn't an "itoa" function be more
> efficient and be less problematic?
This particular call could be so replaced, but it wouldn't solve the
general problem. snprintf has to work.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql | 2005-03-01 20:38:58 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-03-01 20:29:43 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pgsql | 2005-03-01 20:38:58 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |
| Previous Message | pgsql | 2005-03-01 20:29:43 | Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression |