Re: language handlers in public schema?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: language handlers in public schema?
Date: 2005-06-24 00:46:31
Message-ID: 20687.1119573991@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Is there any reason for us to keep putting the language handler
> functions in the public schema?

I believe one of the issues there is that pg_dump doesn't dump functions
that are in pg_catalog. You could possibly fix it to make an exception
for functions that are referenced by pg_language entries, but I think
this would be a nontrivial change.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2005-06-24 01:12:16 Re: [PATCHES] O_DIRECT for WAL writes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-06-24 00:31:13 Re: Fixing r-tree semantics

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-06-24 01:06:40 Re: Another unused variable
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2005-06-24 00:01:31 language handlers in public schema?