| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Kevin Brown <kevin(at)sysexperts(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol |
| Date: | 2003-06-26 02:58:39 |
| Message-ID: | 20682.1056596319@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> One way I could imagine doing it is to split log_min_messages into
>> three variables, along the lines of "minimum message level to produce
>> a TERSE report", "minimum message level to produce a DEFAULT report",
>> and "minimum message level to produce a VERBOSE report". This seems
>> a bit inelegant though. Better ideas anyone?
> I doubt someone would want to control terse/default/verbose at various
> levels --- I assume they would just want all their messages to be
> terse/default/ or verbose.
<shrug> That would certainly be the least work to implement. I was
fishing to see if anyone felt that more is needed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2003-06-26 03:02:10 | Re: Updating psql for features of new FE/BE protocol |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-06-26 02:42:02 | Re: row description for domain in 7.4 |