Re: [HACKERS] changing major/minor on libpq for releases ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] changing major/minor on libpq for releases ...
Date: 1999-06-29 21:21:07
Message-ID: 20669.930691267@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> Just curious, but how do ppl handle running two different versions on the
> same machine? I want to start up a v6.5 server where v6.4.2 server
> already exists...

Run them with different port addresses. I do it all the time...

> I'm wondering if it might make sense to up the libpq on a release, so that
> this can work?

No, I don't think that's a good idea. There's no reason to break binary
compatibility of libpq when setting PGPORT will do the job; the same
psql binary (or any other application) can talk to either release.

regards, tom lane

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 1999-06-29 21:32:05 Re: [HACKERS] Perl library (was Building Postgres)
Previous Message The Hermit Hacker 1999-06-29 21:15:28 RE: [HACKERS] User requests now that 6.5 is out