Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Am Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:58 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> A couple of recently discussed FE/BE protocol issues are: not storing a
>>> plan at all for unnamed-statement cases, and thus allowing bind
>>> parameters to be treated as constants; allowing parameter types to go
>>> unresolved rather than throwing an error. Perhaps it's too late to
>>> consider these for 8.2, but they seem no more invasive than some other
>>> items on the open-issues list.
>> Do we have a patch for that today?
> We could have a patch for the first one today --- I was thinking about
> it last night and intending to code it today.
Proposed patch attached --- just the code, haven't looked at what to
change in the documentation yet. There's not a lot to it.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2006-09-06 16:48:50|
|Subject: DNS fixed|
|Previous:||From: Teodor Sigaev||Date: 2006-09-06 16:41:24|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Fix compiler warnings on 64-bit|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Naz Gassiep||Date: 2006-09-06 18:07:58|
|Subject: Timezone List|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2006-09-06 16:23:37|
|Subject: Re: Open items for 8.2|