Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] Open items for 8.2

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-patches(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open items for 8.2
Date: 2006-09-06 16:43:29
Message-ID: 20616.1157561009@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>> Am Dienstag, 5. September 2006 05:58 schrieb Tom Lane:
>>> A couple of recently discussed FE/BE protocol issues are: not storing a
>>> plan at all for unnamed-statement cases, and thus allowing bind
>>> parameters to be treated as constants; allowing parameter types to go
>>> unresolved rather than throwing an error.  Perhaps it's too late to
>>> consider these for 8.2, but they seem no more invasive than some other
>>> items on the open-issues list.

>> Do we have a patch for that today?

> We could have a patch for the first one today --- I was thinking about
> it last night and intending to code it today.

Proposed patch attached --- just the code, haven't looked at what to
change in the documentation yet.  There's not a lot to it.

			regards, tom lane


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2006-09-06 16:48:50
Subject: DNS fixed
Previous:From: Teodor SigaevDate: 2006-09-06 16:41:24
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] pgsql: Fix compiler warnings on 64-bit

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Naz GassiepDate: 2006-09-06 18:07:58
Subject: Timezone List
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2006-09-06 16:23:37
Subject: Re: Open items for 8.2

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group