Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, valiouk(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, dx k9 <bitsandbytes88(at)hotmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Date: 2008-12-17 03:31:15
Message-ID: 20538.1229484675@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-docspgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you're going to give a formula, why not just give a formula, eg

> You mean like this:
> 	http://momjian.us/tmp/pgsql/kernel-resources.html

Yeah, more or less.  A couple thoughts now that I see it worked out:

* Combining the entries for max_connections and autovacuum_max_workers
is probably just making it look more complicated than it needs to.
How about two rows that just happen to have similar formulas, viz

max_connections		(1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * max_connections
autovacuum_max_workers	(1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * autovacuum_max_workers

* The right-hand column header should be something like "Approximate
shared memory bytes..." to avoid the impression that these formulas
are meant to be exact.

* If we do it like this then the left-hand column is really redundant,
not to say wrong because the right-hand formulas depend on more than
the single variable mentioned.  How about something like

	Table 17-2	PostgreSQL shared memory usage

Purpose				Approximate number of bytes required (as of 8.3)

Per-connection state		(1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * max_connections
Autovacuum worker state		(1800 + 270 * max_locks_per_transaction) * autovacuum_max_workers
Prepared transaction state	...
Shared disk buffers		...
WAL buffers			...
Fixed space requirements	770kB


			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-12-17 13:41:40
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-12-17 01:33:36
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Brendan JurdDate: 2008-12-17 03:43:53
Subject: Re: Variadic parameters vs parameter defaults
Previous:From: Gregory StarkDate: 2008-12-17 03:26:32
Subject: Re: Looking for someone with MinGW

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Michael MonnerieDate: 2008-12-17 09:10:52
Subject: Re: reindexdb dying with SIGPIPE on 8.2.5
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2008-12-17 01:33:36
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] shared_buffers and shmmax

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group