Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>
Cc: Andreas Pflug <Andreas(dot)Pflug(at)web(dot)de>,Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>,"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Date: 2003-06-26 02:37:48
Message-ID: 20518.1056595068@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that "source" is worth knowing.

Hm, possibly.  Any other opinions?

>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take.  Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?

> I vaguely remember the thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2003-05/msg00190.php

> I don't see any followup (agreements or disagreements). Do you want me 
> to change that while I'm at it?

No, I can handle it (and it should be a separate commit anyway).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2003-06-26 02:42:02
Subject: Re: row description for domain in 7.4
Previous:From: Jan WieckDate: 2003-06-26 02:15:31
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Joe ConwayDate: 2003-06-26 05:13:16
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2003-06-26 01:45:13
Subject: Re: ecpg fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group