Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
> ISTM that "source" is worth knowing.
Hm, possibly. Any other opinions?
>> This reminds me, someone (Barry?) was griping that SHOW DATESTYLE
>> doesn't produce a value that SET DATESTYLE will take. Did we agree
>> that it was OK to change the output to look like "ISO, US" etc?
> I vaguely remember the thread:
> I don't see any followup (agreements or disagreements). Do you want me
> to change that while I'm at it?
No, I can handle it (and it should be a separate commit anyway).
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2003-06-26 02:42:02|
|Subject: Re: row description for domain in 7.4 |
|Previous:||From: Jan Wieck||Date: 2003-06-26 02:15:31|
|Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Joe Conway||Date: 2003-06-26 05:13:16|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables|
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2003-06-26 01:45:13|
|Subject: Re: ecpg fix|