From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | karl(at)debisschop(dot)net |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Solaris compile problem |
Date: | 2000-06-06 05:20:38 |
Message-ID: | 20497.960268838@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Karl DeBisschop <kdebisschop(at)h00a0cc3b7988(dot)ne(dot)mediaone(dot)net> writes:
>> Can you say if libpq++ *ever* built on that platform? I'm guessing
>> that Solaris needs the same sort of hack that is present in libpq++'s
>> Makefile for irix5, ie set AR and LD to $(CXX). But if I'm right
>> then it'd never have worked...
> it did work in 6.4.2
OK, that's a useful datapoint.
> and ld does work in other parts of the make - it only fails in this one
> place.
Sure. I think the problem likely is that the stock "ld" on Solaris only
copes with C object files and not C++ object files. This only shows up
for libpq++ because we have no other C++ code in the distribution.
However, as far as I can tell from a quick scan through the CVS server,
6.4.* should've tried to use "ld" for libpq++ too. Could you rebuild
6.4.2 and see what the difference is in the build commands it uses?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2000-06-06 13:57:25 | Re: Solaris compile problem |
Previous Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2000-06-06 02:12:51 | Re: Solaris compile problem |