Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Date: 2001-03-28 23:51:13
Message-ID: 20482.985823473@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-adminpgsql-hackerspgsql-ports
Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> FYI, the WU-FTPD code (2.6.0 or better) has a couple of more platforms 
> including UnixWare.  The UnixWare code will need /dev/kmem permission to 
> change it's stuff, so I don't know whether we want to do this or not, but 
> if people are looking at the ps stuff, please look at this as well.

Well, *I* sure wouldn't run Postgres with write permission on /dev/kmem.
Especially not just to make ps_status work...

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-ports by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2001-03-28 23:54:13
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-28 23:48:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2001-03-28 23:54:13
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-28 23:48:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

pgsql-admin by date

Next:From: Larry RosenmanDate: 2001-03-28 23:54:13
Subject: Re: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-03-28 23:48:27
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group