Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> Currently, the check for exclusion constraints performs a sanity check
> that's slightly too strict -- it assumes that a tuple will conflict with
> itself. That is not always the case: the operator might be "<>", in
> which case it's perfectly valid for the search for conflicts to not find
> itself.

> This patch simply removes that sanity check, and leaves a comment in
> place.

Applied (for 9.1 only).

			regards, tom lane

In response to

• small exclusion constraints patch at 2010-05-21 19:03:40 from Jeff Davis

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:	From: Robert Haas	Date: 2010-07-16 01:57:44
	Subject: Re: SHOW TABLES
Previous:	From: Alvaro Herrera	Date: 2010-07-16 00:37:19
	Subject: Re: SHOW TABLES