Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

mingw doesn't like PGOPTIONS?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: mingw doesn't like PGOPTIONS?
Date: 2008-11-25 22:55:41
Message-ID: 20415.1227653741@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
It appears that the mingw faction of the buildfarm doesn't like this
patch:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2008-11/msg00289.php

The failures look like the regression tests are being run with
intervalstyle = iso (the default) rather than postgres_verbose
as they ought to be.  Which means that there's something wrong
with the new code in pg_regress.c that tries to set that via
PGOPTIONS instead of via PGINTERVALSTYLE.  But what, and why is
it only happening on those machines?

			regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: David RowleyDate: 2008-11-25 23:24:24
Subject: Re: Windowing Function Patch Review -> Standard Conformance
Previous:From: Martijn van OosterhoutDate: 2008-11-25 22:40:07
Subject: Re: Column reordering in pg_dump

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group