Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii(at)sra(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
>> BTW, we are not *that* far from being able to roll back a DROP TABLE.
>> The only thing that's really needed is for everyone to take a deep
>> breath and let go of the notion that table files ought to be named
>> after the tables. If we named table files after the OIDs of their
>> tables, then rollback-able DROP or RENAME TABLE would be pretty
>> straightforward. If you don't recall why this is, consult the
>> pghackers archives...
> So what was the conclusion for 7.0?
Too late to consider it for 7.0, I think. I'd like to see it happen in
7.1 or 7.2 or so.
>> Disallow DROP TABLE/DROP INDEX inside a transaction block
> We should remove above from HISTORY, no?
Yes, it's not correct.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Thomas Lockhart||Date: 2000-03-07 16:57:45|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] library policy question|
|Previous:||From: Patrick Welche||Date: 2000-03-07 16:40:31|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] alter_table.sql|