| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patent issues and 8.1 |
| Date: | 2005-01-27 15:49:07 |
| Message-ID: | 20409.1106840947@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> How hard would it be to do as several have suggested already ... abstract
> out the ARC/LRU stuff into an API?
That was basically my objection to Neil's draft patch: it didn't make
any effort to abstract out a cleaner API. I'll try to look into this
after we have the security releases out of the way.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-01-27 17:51:12 | Re: [pgsql-hackers] Patent issues and 8.1 |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-01-27 15:40:43 | Re: Patent issues and 8.1 |