David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 10:01:44PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> So, hum, what happened to the idea of creating the array types only
>> on demand?
> Scotched, as far as I could tell,
More like "you submitted a patch that entirely ignores multiple people's
opinion on what is needed".
Bruce may have put this into the patch queue, but do not labor under
the delusion that that means it'll get applied as-is. The queue is
currently operating as a list of open issues.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Hannu Krosing||Date: 2007-04-03 06:34:02|
|Subject: Re: Feature thought: idle in transaction timeout|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-04-03 06:16:56|
|Subject: Re: Calling void functions|
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Marko Kreen||Date: 2007-04-03 07:15:58|
|Subject: RESET SESSION v2|
|Previous:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2007-04-03 06:14:33|
|Subject: Re: Logging checkpoints and other slowdown causes|