Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Bug #477: path ?# path

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: curtis(at)northwestern(dot)edu, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Bug #477: path ?# path
Date: 2001-10-13 17:43:02
Message-ID: 20351.1002994982@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org writes:
> the ?# (geometric intersection) operator for paths iterates over point
> pairs in each path testing for intersection. however, it ignores the
> last->first point pair for closed paths.

Looks like a bug to me too; and path_distance, path_length, dist_ppath
also fail to consider the closing segment of a closed path.

Fixed for 7.2.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2001-10-13 20:17:57
Subject: Infinity confuses planner (was Re: query plan)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2001-10-13 04:14:46
Subject: Re: ecpg - GRANT bug

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group