Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl> writes:
> On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:16:15PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> There seems to be a distinct lack of unanimity about that judgment ;-)
> Well, yes, _across Postgres hackers_. But if we were to ask
> pgsql-general I have a feeling we would measure more weight on one side.
Yeah, but which side ;-) ? I think the pg-general population would have
a very much higher fraction of people who have no user-defined functions
and therefore would see no value in \df not showing system functions.
If we put in a config variable, that at least lowers the stakes for the
losing side in the argument about what the default should be. Without
that, I think there will be some serious flamewars ahead...
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2005-05-28 02:21:19|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location?|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2005-05-28 00:40:30|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Fix PID file location? |