| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, daveg <daveg(at)sonic(dot)net>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| Date: | 2008-07-21 06:47:50 |
| Message-ID: | 203.1216622870@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> I also suggested having three options
> --want-pre-schema
> --want-data
> --want-post-schema
> so we could ask for any or all parts in the one dump. --data-only and
> --schema-only are negative options so don't allow this.
> (I don't like those names either, just thinking about capabilities)
Maybe invert the logic?
--omit-pre-data
--omit-data
--omit-post-data
Not wedded to these either, just tossing out an idea...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | daveg | 2008-07-21 07:21:31 | Re: pg_dump lock timeout |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-21 06:17:20 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | daveg | 2008-07-21 07:21:31 | Re: pg_dump lock timeout |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2008-07-21 06:17:20 | Re: pg_dump additional options for performance |