Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #1161: User permissions are kept, even if user is

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>
Cc: Martin <martin(at)4finger(dot)net>,PostgreSQL Bugs List <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #1161: User permissions are kept, even if user is
Date: 2004-06-09 13:34:19
Message-ID: 20231.1086788059@sss.pgh.pa.us (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> writes:
> I was thinking that any integer attribute of any tuple in a shared 
> relation would be ok to store a sequence value.

Certainly not --- when there are multiple versions of the tuple because
of MVCC rules, which do you use?

			regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-06-09 14:04:22
Subject: Re: BUG #1161: User permissions are kept, even if user is
Previous:From: Fabien COELHODate: 2004-06-09 08:24:21
Subject: Re: BUG #1161: User permissions are kept, even if user is

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group