Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Date: 2005-04-26 14:53:09
Message-ID: 2023.1114527189@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
> Also, the blunder-on-regardless approach is popular in pg_dump, or so I'm
> told ;-).

Sure, but pg_dump scripts don't try to execute as a single transaction.
None of this discussion applies to the behavior outside an explicit
transaction block.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Teodor Sigaev 2005-04-26 14:54:39 Re: btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-04-26 14:49:03 btree_gist regression tests failing in 8.0 branch?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-04-26 14:57:49 Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in psql
Previous Message Philip Warner 2005-04-26 14:48:05 Re: [HACKERS] Continue transactions after errors in