Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: CF3+4

From: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>,Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CF3+4
Date: 2013-01-17 07:15:52
Message-ID: 20130117071552.GA9319@toroid.org (view raw or flat)
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 2013-01-17 16:05:05 +0900, michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> Is it really necessary to create a new commit fest just to move the
> items? Marking the patches that are considered as being too late for
> 9.3 should be just returned with feedback.

Opening 2013-03 is not so much to move existing patches, but to give
people a place to submit *new* post-9.3 patches without interrupting
the 2013-01 CF.

-- Abhijit


In response to

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 07:05:05 from Michael Paquier

Responses

  • Re: CF3+4 at 2013-01-17 08:43:51 from Magnus Hagander

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Pavan DeolaseeDate: 2013-01-17 07:19:08
Subject: Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution)
Previous:From: Michael PaquierDate: 2013-01-17 07:05:05
Subject: Re: CF3+4

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2014 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group